Today, a dismissal order in the Ellora’s Cave v. Dear Author case was filed by federal court Judge John R. Adams. Here is the entire body text of that order:
On October 22, 2015, the parties contacted the Court to confirm that the parties reached a settlement agreement on all claims. Therefore, the docket will now be marked “settled and dismissed without prejudice.” The parties may submit within thirty (30) days of this order a proposed entry setting forth different terms and conditions relative to the settlement and dismissal of this case, including dismissal with prejudice, if they deem it necessary. If approved, the proposed entry shall supplement this order. This Court retains jurisdiction over the settlement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Therefore I’d like to make a point clear again: despite the rumors circulating that the judge ordered the settlement, let’s put it this way: what the judge wrote shows that claim to be far from reality based.
In my limited experience reading dockets, however, it’s unusual for a completed settlement to be “without prejudice.”
Links to More Authors Speaking Out
(a.k.a. The Department of Holiday Shopping)
Right after the settlement was announced almost two months ago, there was a pall of silence for a bit, but since then, quite a few more authors have spoken out about their experiences with Ellora’s Cave.
Here are some of those links with a summary of each. I’ve listed the authors in alphabetical order by first name.
- A.M. Griffin posts asking readers not to purchase her Ellora’s Cave titles (the “Dangerously” series). Her post also has links to her non-EC titles, including some under other pseudonyms.
-
Ann Jacobs posts about having first published with EC in 2003, and how her eyes were opened. (Ann still has a motion pending in the Ellora’s Cave v. Dear Author case claiming she’s owed $193,000 in back royalties.) Ann has also asked readers not to purchase her EC books while they’re still at EC. Here’s Ann’s Amazon author page.
-
Cait Miller started out with Ellora’s Cave in 2003, which is fairly early. Quote: “Maybe two years ago my sales had dropped so drastically that I started to question my books fit with EC.” Note that this was before the Dear Author article and thus the lawsuit. She doesn’t have any non-EC books available at this time, so I’ll link to her author page if/when that changes.
-
Denise A. Agnew has asked readers not to purchase her Ellora’s Cave titles while she’s still at EC. Here’s Denise’s Amazon page.
-
Frances Stockton started out with Ellora’s Cave as a Paranormal Historical line for the company’s Cerridwen Press imprint, which later became their Blush imprint. Frances’s Amazon page is here, and her non-EC title is here. I’ll speak to Jaid Black’s comments on Frances’s post in a separate entry.
-
Jane Leopold Quinn posts her own story.
I’m out of the mix since I’m one of the authors who paid money to get my rights back. I’ve never spoken up in public before about this, but to see people claim that EC won the lawsuit and DA apologized is NOT what has happened. I’ve been wanting to speak out but wasn’t sure what venue to use. This is as good a venue as anywhere. EC still has its fans, but the public should at least take into account that many, many authors saying the same things about a publisher just might be telling the truth.
-
Kate Sherwood published one novella with Ellora’s Cave and describes her experience. As for timing, she says:
I asked for my rights back, I think for the first time, shortly after EC sued DA. I just didn’t want any money from my writing going to support that kind of nonsense. I was refused because my sales were still above the threshold. Fair enough.
-
Kelly Jamieson has told her story here. She first signed with Ellora’s Cave in 2009, and points out that she became dissatisfied with EC in 2012. I mostly know her as a Samhain writer and have read quite a few of her titles for that house. Kelly’s Amazon page can be found here.
-
Titiana Ladley spoke out on Twitter:
Dear readers, please don’t buy my remaining 3 EC books. If EC can’t remember 2 pay me, then I hope you forget 2 buy. Thanks! #notchilled
Titiana’s phasing out that pseudonym, and here’s her first title writing as Josie Jax.
Best of luck to all the above authors! (Especially those still waiting on reversions from Ellora’s Cave.)
Also, here’s a recent post from Tymber Dalton who has some important points about contracts.
I am not a lawyer, and don’t presume to know that much about the law, so please indulge me while I display my ignorance.
“Without prejudice” means that EC could file the exact same suit against Dear Author/Jane Litte at any time in the future, whether or not Dear Author/Jane Litte comply with the terms of the agreement, correct?
If so…how’s that a good, or even “not a bad,” thing for anyone, let alone for Jane?
I believe that is correct. The wording in legal terms is weird. Dismissal with prejudice means the case is over and done. Without prejudice means the case could be opened again. Keep in mind, I did a Google search and read a few documents and explanations on several legal websites. My way of saying I’m not a lawyer 🙂
Without Predjudice means that EITHER party can bring this suit back up, including Jane’s counter suit.
This also leaves the door open for either party to set aside the settlement, motions to dismiss with predjudice (unable to file further claims along the lines of the suit/countersuit), etc.
all in my opinion. Very interesting that he didn’t address Ann’s motion to interject.
With him leaving the door open like that makes it seem like he wanted to persue this case further, but was willing to let them settle.
Can a party bring a counter claim when the suit it springs from has been dismissed? Or can the counter claim only be filed after the original suit is filed again?
Well, if the counterclaim is refiled without the original claim having been refiled, it transforms to a claim in the new lawsuit. Hope that makes sense.
It makes sense in the real world; I wasn’t sure it made sense in court.
“The parties may submit within thirty (30) days of this order a proposed entry setting forth different terms and conditions relative to the settlement and dismissal of this case, including dismissal with prejudice, if they deem it necessary. If approved, the proposed entry shall supplement this order.”
Can we infer from the above that there are still things happening between EC and DA with regard to the settlement? Otherwise, I don’t see what could be brought up in the next 30 days, although my understanding is limited at best.
One more thing…where does this leave Ann Jacobs request to be added to the suit, if I might ask? Is that now completely moot? (If moot is the right word to use.)