Amazon invokes World War II. (Do Not Linkified because why should they get all the Google juice?)
Also, structure of email opening is remarkably similar to http://t.co/redsJvrNhc from @andrewtshaffer (which has full Orwell quote)
— andrea vuleta (@alv65) August 9, 2014
Except, of course, they said “World War II” rather than 1939 because that carries so much more emotional weight. It’s Godwin’s Law by proxy.
Also, as a technical point, this was an innovation in the US, and the US wasn’t involved in WWII in 1939 (not until Pearl Harbor in December, 1941). Not only that, as Andrew’s article points out, the paperback started in June, 1939, and World War II is generally considered to have started with the Invasion of Poland on 1 September, 1939.
So not only did they invoke WWII for all the emotional baggage it carries, their email opening is factually incorrect.
@alv65 When you google “paperback history” or “paperback revolution,” my story is the first hit. So it’s possible they just crammed it.
— Andrew Shaffer (@andrewtshaffer) August 9, 2014
@GlennF They also twisted the Orwell quote to make it look like he hated paperbacks. Just the opposite: pic.twitter.com/V0M60brNcu
— Andrew Shaffer (@andrewtshaffer) August 9, 2014
@GlennF Looks like they took it—and their opening graf—from my Mental Floss article. I dunno. Crazy no matter what. http://t.co/1TFYAg07TG
— Andrew Shaffer (@andrewtshaffer) August 9, 2014
@GlennF Now that I look back into the quote, looks like he thought paperbacks were good for readers, bad for trade. pic.twitter.com/z09AOFRBuo
— Andrew Shaffer (@andrewtshaffer) August 9, 2014
@GlennF I still don’t think he was literally suggesting publishers collude, though, which is what Amazon’s letter seems to suggest.
— Andrew Shaffer (@andrewtshaffer) August 9, 2014
Then Amazon gives the email address of Hachette’s CEO, but not their own.
Because Amazon wants to play fair, right?
No.
Cora Buhlert Has an Even Better Point
Edited to add Cora Buhlert’s fabulous tweets:
@deirdresm @cathryanhoward Besides, Germany has had paperbacks since 1867.
— Cora Buhlert (@CoraBuhlert) August 9, 2014
@deirdresm @cathryanhoward And they cost 20 pennies, 25 pennies from 1917 on. I demand a return to the prices of the Second Empire.
— Cora Buhlert (@CoraBuhlert) August 9, 2014
@deirdresm @cathryanhoward In case you need a reference for the 1867 paperbacks, try this one: http://t.co/xbFhRgpuCm
— Cora Buhlert (@CoraBuhlert) August 9, 2014
[…] “penny dreadfuls,” “dime novels” and “pulps” (further comment on these and other flubs here and here) — the central problem with Amazon’s argument is economic, to wit, it’s trying to […]