Twenty years ago today, the battle of Scientology vs. the Internet leveled up with the anonymous posting of secret Scientology scriptures to the newsgroup alt.religion.scientology. Here’s what the Wikipedia page says:
On December 24, 1994, the first of a large number of anonymous messages was posted to alt.religion.scientology, containing the text of the “secret” writings of Scientology known as the OT Levels (OT stands for “Operating Thetan”).
There were five posts.
Large numbers of anonymous posts came months (and even years) later. The initial anon volley, however, was small.
As Wikipedia says:
Included among these postings was OT III (Operating Thetan Level Three), which gave L. Ron Hubbard’s description of the “Xenu story”.
Incorrect.
First, for those who don’t know the Xenu story, the tl;dr version is that due to overpopulation, Xenu ordered people brought in for an income tax audit, froze them, then brought them en masse to Earth where they were blown up in a volcano (Hawaii and Las Palmas, among others) with hydrogen bombs, sticking those spiritually frozen beings to others. And that, in order to be free, one has to audit all those beings stuck to you using Scientology’s expensive and confidential procedures.
In fact, a Class VIII course (which covers the materials of OT III) tape transcript had previously been posted non-anonymously to alt.religion.scientology by Dennis Erlich: tape 6810C03, titled Assists, that included information about Xemu. You can find a transcript linked from this page.
When Erlich posted the transcript, what did Scientology do?
Crickets.
That’s right. Nothing at all.
The first person to write anything publicly about Xenu was Robert Kaufman in his 1972 book, Inside Scientology: How I Joined Scientology and Became Superhuman. Links to the actual book: PDF and HTML
There were no offices available in which to discuss highly dangerous data, so we used a bathroom, Cramming perched on the edge of the tub, myself astride the throne.
“What don’t you understand about these instructions?” she asked.
“I can’t even begin to tell you. For one thing, it says, ‘First locate a body thetan.’ Now, how in hell do you locate a body thetan?”
Thetan, in Scientology parlance, means the spirit as distinct from the body and the mind. They don’t mean brain when they say mind. It’s more the spiritual mechanics of the thetan/body interface.
The space opera antics comprising OT III meant that normal people had been so traumatized, what with being shipped all the way over here and blown up, that they no longer were capable of running bodies on their own. Some of them banded together in clusters and others as individuals, and they basically hang around less messed-up beings—like you and me—and make up our body, not to mention numerous ailments.
In 1981, Richard Leiby of the Clearwater Sun became the first journalist to publish a piece describing OT III, including an excerpt from Hubbard’s writings. The article opens:
At the Fort Harrison Hotel in downtown Clearwater, Scientologists are learning to leave their bodies, control other people’s thoughts and communicate with plant life. They learn this by reliving a galactic holocaust carried out by space creatures millions of years ago.
(Note: insert here a Reader’s Digest article from 1981. See notes at bottom.)
A summary of OT III and the whole Xenu thing had previously been printed in the Los Angeles Times in 1985:
Documents obtained by the Los Angeles Times show that members of the Church of Scientology believe that mankind’s ills were caused by an evil ruler named Xemu who lived 75 million years ago.
Erlich’s posting wasn’t the first post about OT III or the widest audience. It was simply the first where part of the source materials had been made broadly available on the Internet.
I’ve always thought that Scientology’s embarrassed about the contents, because Scientology’s reaction after the LA Times piece was to deny that these were the materials of OT III. Hubbard was still alive at that point.
Nevertheless, OT III involved the introduction of the concept of “body thetans” in OT III—those pestiferous beings-who-are-not-you clogging up your space and misbehaving on your behalf.
OT III had been covered before, in print and on the internet, several times. It wasn’t new, and thus the CofS wouldn’t go crazy over its revelation. Hence, I hope I’ve debunked the idea that this was a part of 1994’s Christmas Eve “revelation.”
The Christmas Eve Docs
Each of the five Christmas Eve docs consisted of the confidential levels after the state of Clear is attained and after OT III.
These five documents were posted anonymously to alt.religion.scientology through a replay.com crypto remailer. What specifically was posted has been misreported, partly because the source postings have been vaporized from the ‘net.
Here’s the correct document list. They are all still on Wikileaks if you’d like to read them. Source is Dennis Ehrlich’s 1995 declaration.
- NED for OTs RD, Theory Of. (HCOB 15 September 1978 I, NOTs Series 1)
NOTs, or “New Era Dianetics (NED) for Operating Thetans (OTs)” was introduced in 1978 as a special rundown. Eventually, the older OT IV, V, VI, and VII levels were canceled and replaced with various NOTs rundowns.
This document is an introduction to the theory of NOTs. Until this was posted, the specific contents of NOTs had never been made public. One of the interesting quirks is that, for telepathy between body thetans, “there is a proximity factor.” Except thetans are supposed to exist outside of Matter, Energy, Space, and Time (aka the MEST universe). Anyhow, it talks about telepathy between BTs, how clusters of BTs work, how they create the person’s “thoughts,” how they affect memory, how they create illness, etc. For a single issue, it basically lays out what the post-1982 Scientology levels from OT IV through OT VII consist of: years of this stuff. -
The Sequence for Handling a Physical Condition. (HCOB 14 November 1978, NOTs series 34)
This particular issue is of interest because Scientology often claims that of course Scientology doesn’t fix illness and that people should see their physicians, yada yada yada. As anyone who’s been in any period of time can tell you, that’s not the actual practice. Oh, sure, you can go to a doctor—after you go through the Medical Liaison Officer (if you’re staff) or Ethics (if you’re not). You may be threatened with a Purification Rundown if you take any drugs, including antibiotics. This particular issue gives the order of addressing physical illness. -
Notes on PTS. (HCOB 29 October 1978 III, NOTs Series 35)
One of the fundamental theories of Scientology is that people can be a Potential Trouble Source (PTS) because they are under the thumb of a Suppressive Person (SP). This short issue talks about body thetans (the beings stuck to you) and how they can be PTS to successive persons and how you can get into trouble by mis-auditing these imaginary beings. -
Rockslams. (HCOB 22 September 1978 I, NOTs Series 36)
Rockslams are an e-meter phenomenon, described thus:A Rock slam is a crazy, irregular, unequal, jerky motion of the needle, narrow as one inch or as wide as three inches happening several times a second. The needle ‘goes crazy’, slamming back and forth, narrowly, widely, over on the left, over on the right, in a mad war dance or as if it were frantically trying to escape. (EME, p. 17)
LRH called it “the most important needle manifestation” (HCOB 10 August 1976, R/Ses, What They Mean), and went on to say:
A rockslam means a hidden evil intention on the subject or question under discussion or auditing.
So this particular NOTs document talks about auditing rockslams on body thetans. Because of course some of them have evil purposes. Scientology’s big on finding out secret evil things.
-
Amends and Clarifies NED for OTs Series 27. (HCOB 31 January 1979, NOTs Series 43)
This is a short and weirdly technical thing to post, but it addresses some of what was being discussed in ARS at the time. Namely, that in the lower levels of Scientology (before Clear), an auditor generally asks if the person is interested in running a specific process. This one, however, says:Step 4 of the NED for OTs Rundown (Series 27) is subdivided into 9 actions (4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 4F, 4G, 4H, 4I). The instruction to check interest only applies to Step 4F, (Repair of Past Auditing). All the other steps, (4A – 4E, 4F – 4I) are done without checking interest.
The usual rules of not running anything that doesn’t read, and checking for false read or protest if the pc is not interested or protesty, apply to all steps.In Scientology, sometimes an auditor asks if a person is interested in “running” (addressing) a question. The e-meter “reading” (acting in a particular way) is assumed to indicate interest.
The rest of the issue is about adding an additional step at the end of each category of items if there are any problems at that point.
NOTs Basic Theory, A Summary
To be clear, I don’t believe any of this. It’s just the theory.
Dianetics doesn’t work (well) on Clears or above because it asks for components of the reactive mind, which a Clear no longer has. However, a Clear still has body thetans, so when one tries to audit Dianetics questions on a Clear, the person comes up with answers from their body thetans or clusters (of body thetans) and can go into a tailspin. Because there are lots more body thetans, and they’re constantly chattering and complaining.
Further, NOTs theory says that body thetans copy bits of case from other body thetans, kind of the way bacteria exchange DNA with each other (and thus build up antibiotic resistance). Except in this case, it means that problems keep coming back. (Convenient, no?)
Most of these BTs are below the level of conscious awareness, and irritating them, well, “it does affect the body—severely.” (HCOB 15 September 1978 II, NOTs Series 2, Why You Can’t Run Engrams After Clear)
To someone who is an Operating Thetan, the body appears transparent. Anywhere it does not, well, that’s because of body thetans and clusters making it appear solid.
Well, that’s the theory.
Here’s What I Think
Scientology’s a long con with a lot of carnival hucksterism thrown in for good measure.
It’s never produced all of what Dianetics (the book, aka Book 1) promised a Clear was. In 1950. After years and years of spinning new auditing processes, in 1965, L. Ron Hubbard released the Clearing Course. Then after you’d done a boatload of different processes (like a pachinko machine), you finally got rid of enough bad stuff to get to Clear.
Except that you still weren’t a Clear by the Book 1 definition.
So there had to be theories about what was still going on—other than the processes hadn’t worked, of course!
I’m really not sure about what Hubbard did and did not believe of his own con. It’s revealed in the Epilogue of Lawrence Wright’s excellent book Going Clear that LRH pestered one of his underlings to rig an e-meter to kill Hubbard. (That didn’t happen.)
However, at some point, Hubbard realized that NOTs was a big level. Before NOTs, the levels OT IV-VII were a few weeks to a few months, at most. NOTs, however, people are commonly on for years. It became a huge cash cow for people who’d essentially topped out on all that Scientology had to offer, but still hadn’t solved their problems. The same is still true after NOTs, but at least Scientology has more money, right?
And when OT VII and, later, OT VIII weren’t enough to do placate people, the CofS saw to it that people were busted all the way back down to the start with the Purification rundown. Some people have done the whole thing, ground up, two or three times.
I can’t imagine.
One of the things that keeps people in line is the promise of future OT levels. Hubbard died in 1986, so I’m not exactly sure how long they’re going to draw this out before revealing what some upper-level ex-execs have said: there is nothing else.
It’s just one big mystery-in-a-circus-tent after another, and each level isn’t actually what was promised.
Scientology can’t make up its mind if it’s all about the quasi-gnostic concept of the material universe is crap or if the material universe is the real universe. Given that I heard over and over that thetans aren’t bound by matter, energy, space, and time, why should distance in the physical universe have anything to do with anything? Why must telepathic transmission depend on that?
It’s all crap.
Notes:
-
Tony Ortega, who runs the Underground Bunker, a Scientology news site, gave me a heads up about the Kaufman book (which I’m surprised I’ve never read) and the Clearwater Sun article, as well as fact checked the next note. Since the Kaufman book isn’t available in EPUB or Kindle format, I’ll be converting it so it’s more readable on e-readers.
-
Jim Lippard said he first read about OT III in Readers Digest. This article, written by Eugene M. Methvin, was published in October, 1981, is about other Scientology mythology, the Helatrobus implants.
it’s all…BS. Personal opinion only but it’s like being in the Hall of Mirrors in that carnival sideshow that you mentioned. So sad that so many people get sucked in by the promise of good health, professional connections and a self-made family with super powers. So much of the teachings of Scientology are deliberately made obscure by double talk and jargon that people are naturally confused which make any setback the failing of the individual, not the ritual. Creating an us vs them mentality is Manipulation 101 and makes it almost impossible to break free. Usually all they have in the end is an empty bank account. It takes a truly strong individual to realize when it’s time to hit the door.
Sadly, I wasn’t ready to really leave when my contract was up (but I was ready for my contract to be over 2 to 2-1/2 years before it was). If they’d just let me off staff, I’d probably have stayed in for many years.
I was ready to leave staff, but not Scientology, but them forcing me to stay when I was no longer willing (or contracted to) burned the bridge. So to speak.
So, thanks — I think?
Jim may be referring to the Helotrobus implant, which is mentioned in the Reader’s Digest article. But look for yourself — OT 3 is not mentioned, and Xenu is not described in the Methvin’s article.
It was kind of you to show me a rough draft of this piece before you published it, but you might have mentioned that I brought to your attention that it was Robert Kaufman who first wrote about Xenu in 1972 in “Inside Scientology,” and Richard Leiby who wrote about Xenu in the Clearwater Sun several years before the LA Times guys did.
Thanks for the catches, Tony. I was really tired when I was trying to find the piece Lippard referred to, and obviously I didn’t read carefully.
On crediting you, initially I’d done it inline, then moved it to the block below in the notes because I could say more about the Underground Bunker without interrupting the flow. I did lose some edits when I couldn’t find the tab I’d been working in and just gave up and opened another browser window to add something else. I got the dreaded “the version in your browser is more recent” error, but I was incredibly tired and blew past the warning.
I’m sorry that meant I didn’t credit you and didn’t catch that before publishing. I’m also missing another paragraph, but no longer have a backup of that, either.
Excellent article, Deirdre!
Thank you!
[Note: edited to remove links.]
The first postings of the OT levels 1-8 including OTIII were anonymous at the time, by an ex member Joe Harrington. On his death bed he admitted “I am scamizdat!” < the name of the anon poster. He also admitted being the one that mailed me the Fishman document. Which I was raided and sued for in Aug 1995 – ending up on over 200 websites including CMU, and the National University in China.
Federal Judge Brinkema RTC vs Lerma:
"The dispute in this case surrounds Lerma's acquisition and publication on the Internet of texts that the Church of Scientology considers sacred and protects heavily from unauthorized disclosure. Founded by L. Ron Hubbard, the Scientology religion attempts to explain the origin of negative spiritual forces in the world and advances techniques for improving one's own spiritual well-being. Scientologists believe that most human problems can be traced to lingering spirits of an extraterrestrial people massacred by their ruler, Xenu, over 75 million years ago. These spirits attach themselves by "clusters" to individuals in the contemporary world, causing spiritual harm and negatively influencing the lives of their hosts "
…. "The Court earlier dismissed the trade secrets count as to all defendants and the copyright infringement count as to the Washington Post and its reporters. RTC voluntarily dismissed its claims against Digital Gateway systems, Therefore, the only issue remaining in the case is RTC's: .. (3) copyright infringement claim against defendant Lerma"
Towards the end of RTC vs Lerma, $cientology dropped ALL CLAIMS for the materials I posted, and instead moved for a summary judgement, based on a .LOG file of me reading Dennis Erlich's posts on ARS, which were NOTs and NEDS he was sued for posting.
Regards
Arnie Lerma
Could he have learned the skill to do later anon postings? Sure.
But in 1994? Early 1995? No.
He was still having issues with learning the nuances of using a Usenet newsreader. I remember helping him at his house, I think in Sep 1994.
I find your site painful with its moonbattery, so I rarely go there.
Technically, Dennis was sued for re-posting NOTs.
Then you have an issue with Joe Harrington’s death bed admission. Which is your choice.
He was my friend 25 years previous to this. And kept a low profile technically, but was quite saavy, and never let on to me HE was the ONE until Brigitta Dagnell, his wife, told me what he said when he died… Also, perhaps you should have dated your article December 25th, to include this piece that was the first major media hit on $cientology since Behar’s Time Magazine article.
The Christmas Day article 1994, in the Washington Post…
Yes, well, the “admission” was a lie. I don’t know if it’s Bid who lied or if it’s Joe who lied.
Joe and I had a falling out for good reason: Bid, who’d previously been OSA, posted on IRC one night stuff that had been in my ethics or PC folder and OSA had never made public before. Joe left the wife who’d been with him through three heart attacks for an OSA tool.
But, naturally, she’s your friend.
I don’t give a shit about the WaPo article. I dated my piece the 24th for a good reason, which I stated.
I’m done talking to you. Again.
Hi- I was wonder what your fallout was with my grandfather, Joe and why you seem to outwardly dislike him so much. So many people talk big games about him, it makes me wonder who actually knew him.
Hi Dani, nice to meet you. Apologies for the late reply.
Actually, I liked Joe a lot. I visited him in Maine twice, and he visited me in Vermont.
I lost significant respect for him when he dumped his wife of many years, who’d seen him through three heart attacks, for Bid, who was ex-OSA. Now, I don’t know the nitty gritty details of what happened there, as he wasn’t the kind to talk about them even though we’d talk on the phone about everything from mushroom farming to where we’d been in the world. At the time, the whole thing just seemed like an OSA setup, but there had been a lot of those recently near that point in time, so even if it wasn’t an OSA setup, it’d seem that way.
The person in this scenario I actively disliked is Arnie, whom I never trusted farther than I could throw, which turned out to be a good call (given Arnie’s attempted murder of his wife followed by his suicide). I don’t know if Bid actually did tell Arnie that Joe had posted the OT materials or not; I wouldn’t trust either of their answers.
But, let’s assume for a moment that happened, and it happened based on something Joe told Arnie directly or indirectly.
I see that alleged statement of Joe’s in this light: it closed the book as far as Scientology was concerned, especially since he died. So it was a minor kindness to the anon. On the flip side, it stole some of the anon’s cred.
One reason I don’t think it was Joe is how much effort it was to get him to correctly install things like PGP (several hours of phone calls when I helped debug a compile-time error that wasn’t occurring on my machine), and how he had difficulty understanding some of the concepts (several more hours of phone calls), and my recollection is that was *after* the NOTs materials were posted. These days, everyone uses crypto, and few understand it. Back then, the people who used crypto understood what it was and, generally, how it worked. Most Internet communication was still unencrypted text, and most Internet users didn’t have web browsers yet.